⚖️ Political Science · International Relations

IR tricks that make theory stick

Realism, liberalism, soft power, and international institutions.

🌍 Int'l Relations

Memory tricks

Proven mnemonics — fast to learn, hard to forget.

🎥 How Flashcards Work
A quick walkthrough of tap-to-flip, rating, and how card colors track what you're struggling with.
← Back Next →
International Relations deck1 of 16
Tap to flip
← →
How well do YOU think you know this?
Easy Medium Hard Harder
Tap to flip back
International Relations deck
Easy0
Medium0
Hard0
Harder0
Realism
Realism: states are self-interested, world is anarchic — power = security
Realism
The dominant IR theory — states pursue power and security above all
No world government → states must fend for themselves. Alliances are temporary convenience. War is always possible. Explains arms races and balance-of-power politics.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Realism
Realism in international relations?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Realism: states are self-interested, world is anarchic — power = security
No world government → states must fend for themselves. Alliances are temporary convenience. War is always possible. Explains arms races and balance-of-power politics.
Tap to flip back
Liberal Internationalism
Liberalism: cooperation, institutions, democracy reduce conflict
Liberal Internationalism
States can cooperate — institutions and norms genuinely matter
Democratic Peace Theory: democracies rarely fight each other. International institutions (UN, WTO) enable cooperation. Economic interdependence raises cost of war.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Liberal Internationalism
Liberalism in international relations?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Liberalism: cooperation, institutions, democracy reduce conflict
Democratic Peace Theory: democracies rarely fight each other. International institutions (UN, WTO) enable cooperation. Economic interdependence raises cost of war.
Tap to flip back
Soft vs Hard Power
Soft power = persuasion and attraction. Hard power = coercion.
Soft vs Hard Power
Joseph Nye's distinction between two kinds of international influence
Hard power: military force and economic sanctions. Soft power: cultural attraction, diplomacy, values (Hollywood, universities, brands). Smart power combines both strategically.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Soft vs Hard Power
Soft power vs hard power?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Soft power = persuasion and attraction. Hard power = coercion.
Hard power: military force and economic sanctions. Soft power: cultural attraction, diplomacy, values (Hollywood, universities, brands). Smart power combines both strategically.
Tap to flip back
NATO
NATO Article 5: attack one member = attack all — collective defense
NATO
The core commitment of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
32 members. Article 5 has been invoked once — after 9/11. Deterrence through collective security. Expansion eastward since Cold War has been a major source of geopolitical tension.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 NATO
NATO Article 5?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
NATO Article 5: attack one member = attack all — collective defense
32 members. Article 5 has been invoked once — after 9/11. Deterrence through collective security. Expansion eastward since Cold War has been a major source of geopolitical tension.
Tap to flip back
Constructivism
Constructivism: state identity and interests are socially constructed — not fixed
Constructivism
A third IR theory — ideas and identity shape behavior as much as power
States' interests aren't fixed by material factors — they're shaped by ideas, norms, and identities. Anarchy means what states make of it (Wendt). Explains norm changes like abolition of slavery and human rights regimes.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Constructivism
Constructivism in international relations?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Constructivism: state identity and interests are socially constructed — not fixed
States' interests aren't fixed by material factors — they're shaped by ideas, norms, and identities. Anarchy means what states make of it (Wendt). Explains norm changes like abolition of slavery and human rights regimes.
Tap to flip back
Balance of Power
Balance of power: states form alliances to prevent any one state from dominating — key realist concept
Balance of Power
Why states form alliances — to prevent hegemony
Core realist mechanism. When one state grows too powerful, others balance against it through internal balancing (build up military) or external balancing (form alliances). Bandwagoning: weaker states join the rising power instead. Polarity: unipolar (one hegemon, post-Cold War), bipolar (Cold War), multipolar (19th century Europe).
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Balance of Power
Balance of power?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Balance of power: states form alliances to prevent any one state from dominating — key realist concept
Core realist mechanism. When one state grows too powerful, others balance against it through internal balancing (build up military) or external balancing (form alliances). Bandwagoning: weaker states join the rising power instead. Polarity: unipolar (one hegemon, post-Cold War), bipolar (Cold War), multipolar (19th century Europe).
Tap to flip back
International Organizations
International organizations: IGOs (UN, WTO) create rules and forums. Cannot enforce without state consent.
International Organizations
What international organizations can and cannot do
Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs): created by states, membership by states. UN: collective security (Security Council veto), international law, humanitarian missions. WTO: trade rules, dispute resolution. NATO: collective defense. Limitations: no world government, enforcement depends on state compliance and great power consensus.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 International Organizations
International organizations — what can and can't they do?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
International organizations: IGOs (UN, WTO) create rules and forums. Cannot enforce without state consent.
Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs): created by states, membership by states. UN: collective security (Security Council veto), international law, humanitarian missions. WTO: trade rules, dispute resolution. NATO: collective defense. Limitations: no world government, enforcement depends on state compliance and great power consensus.
Tap to flip back
Globalization
Globalization: increased flows of goods, money, people, and ideas across borders. Winners and losers.
Globalization
The increasing interconnection of the world economy
Economic globalization: trade, foreign direct investment, global supply chains. Financial globalization: capital flows across borders instantly. Cultural globalization: spread of ideas, values, media. Winners: consumers (cheaper goods), skilled workers in emerging markets. Losers: low-skilled workers in developed countries competing with cheap labor.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Globalization
Globalization — what flows across borders?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Globalization: increased flows of goods, money, people, and ideas across borders. Winners and losers.
Economic globalization: trade, foreign direct investment, global supply chains. Financial globalization: capital flows across borders instantly. Cultural globalization: spread of ideas, values, media. Winners: consumers (cheaper goods), skilled workers in emerging markets. Losers: low-skilled workers in developed countries competing with cheap labor.
Tap to flip back
Nuclear Deterrence
Nuclear deterrence: mutually assured destruction (MAD) — rational actors won't start a war they can't survive
Nuclear Deterrence
Why nuclear weapons paradoxically promote stability between great powers
MAD: if both sides have second-strike capability (can absorb a first strike and retaliate), nuclear war becomes irrational. Cold War: US and USSR never fought directly despite intense rivalry. Deterrence works when: adversary is rational, retaliatory capability is credible and survivable. Extended deterrence: umbrella covers allies.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Nuclear Deterrence
Nuclear deterrence — how does MAD work?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Nuclear deterrence — MAD
Nuclear deterrence: mutually assured destruction (MAD) — rational actors won't start a war they can't survive
MAD: if both sides have second-strike capability (can absorb a first strike and retaliate), nuclear war becomes irrational. Cold War: US and USSR never fought directly despite intense rivalry. Deterrence works when: adversary is rational, retaliatory capability is credible and survivable. Extended deterrence: umbrella covers allies.
Tap to flip back
Democratic Peace Theory
Democratic Peace Theory: democracies rarely go to war with each other — most robust finding in IR
Democratic Peace Theory
Why the spread of democracy may reduce international conflict
Empirical finding: liberal democracies almost never fight each other. Explanations: institutional (democracies need public support for war), normative (democracies resolve disputes peacefully because they share norms), commercial (democracies trade heavily with each other — war is costly). Not that democracies are peaceful in general.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Democratic Peace Theory
Democratic Peace Theory?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Democratic Peace Theory: democracies rarely go to war with each other — most robust finding in IR
Empirical finding: liberal democracies almost never fight each other. Explanations: institutional (democracies need public support for war), normative (democracies resolve disputes peacefully because they share norms), commercial (democracies trade heavily with each other — war is costly). Not that democracies are peaceful in general.
Tap to flip back
Sovereignty vs Human Rights
Humanitarian intervention: can sovereignty be overridden to protect populations from their own governments?
Sovereignty vs Human Rights
The fundamental tension in post-Cold War international relations
Traditional: state sovereignty is absolute — other states cannot interfere in internal affairs. R2P (Responsibility to Protect, 2005): sovereignty includes responsibility to protect citizens. If state fails, international community has duty to intervene. Kosovo (1999), Libya (2011): invoked R2P. Syria: R2P not applied — Security Council vetoes.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Sovereignty vs Human Rights
Sovereignty vs human rights — the dilemma?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Humanitarian intervention: can sovereignty be overridden to protect populations from their own governments?
Traditional: state sovereignty is absolute — other states cannot interfere in internal affairs. R2P (Responsibility to Protect, 2005): sovereignty includes responsibility to protect citizens. If state fails, international community has duty to intervene. Kosovo (1999), Libya (2011): invoked R2P. Syria: R2P not applied — Security Council vetoes.
Tap to flip back
Security Dilemma
Arms race: mutual fear drives both sides to build weapons — security dilemma creates the problem it tries to solve
Security Dilemma
How defensive measures can trigger conflict through mutual misunderstanding
Security dilemma: one state's defensive buildup looks offensive to others → they build up → first state feels less secure → builds more. Spiral model. Classic example: WWI — mobilization plans locked in war no one wanted. Solutions: arms control agreements, transparency measures, CBMs (confidence-building measures).
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Security Dilemma
The security dilemma?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Arms race: mutual fear drives both sides to build weapons — security dilemma creates the problem it tries to solve
Security dilemma: one state's defensive buildup looks offensive to others → they build up → first state feels less secure → builds more. Spiral model. Classic example: WWI — mobilization plans locked in war no one wanted. Solutions: arms control agreements, transparency measures, CBMs (confidence-building measures).
Tap to flip back
Levels of Analysis
SIS — System, Inter-state, Sub-state individual
Waltz's three images — where you look determines what you find as cause
The same conflict can be explained differently depending on which level of analysis you use
System level (third image): anarchic system forces competition — structure causes war regardless of state type. State level (second image): domestic politics, regime type, economic interests drive foreign policy — democratic peace theory. Individual level (first image): leader psychology, misperception, miscalculation cause war — Hitler and Stalin as causes of WWII.
System
Anarchy leads to self-help and the security dilemma
State
Regime type, interest groups, domestic politics
Individual
Leader psychology, misperception, groupthink
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Levels of Analysis
SIS — the levels of analysis?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
SIS — System, Inter-state, Sub-state individual
SystemAnarchy leads to self-help and the security dilemma
StateRegime type, interest groups, domestic politics
IndividualLeader psychology, misperception, groupthink
Tap to flip back
Nuclear Deterrence
MAD — Mutual Assured Destruction keeps nuclear peace
Mutual Assured Destruction — the logic of nuclear deterrence since the Cold War
MAD works because both sides know a first strike guarantees their own annihilation in retaliation
Deterrence: if attacking guarantees your own destruction, rational actors won't attack. Requires survivable second-strike capability (submarines, dispersed missiles), credible commitment to retaliate, and rational adversaries. Extended deterrence: US nuclear umbrella covers NATO allies. Counterforce weapons threaten second-strike capability — destabilizing.
First strike
Attack first — destabilizing if it could disarm opponent
Second strike
Survive attack and retaliate — submarines are the key
Credibility
Threat must be believed — red lines and commitment devices
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Nuclear Deterrence
MAD — first strike, second strike and credibility?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
MAD — Mutual Assured Destruction keeps nuclear peace
First strikeAttack first — destabilizing if it could disarm opponent
Second strikeSurvive attack and retaliate — submarines are the key
CredibilityThreat must be believed — red lines and commitment devices
Tap to flip back
International Organizations
WINT — WTO, IMF, NATO, UN — major IOs and their functions
Key international organizations, what they do, and their limits
International organizations reduce transaction costs and create focal points — but states still dominate
UN: collective security, peacekeeping, international law — Security Council with P5 veto. WTO: trade rules and dispute settlement. IMF: balance of payments support and conditionality loans. World Bank: development lending. NATO: collective defense, Article 5. EU: supranational integration — single market, common currency, law supersedes member state law.
UN P5
US, UK, France, Russia, China — each has Security Council veto
NATO Art. 5
Attack on one is attack on all — collective defense
IMF conditionality
Austerity in exchange for loans — widely controversial
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 International Organizations
WINT — the major international organizations?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
WINT — WTO, IMF, NATO, UN — major IOs and their functions
UN P5US, UK, France, Russia, China — each has Security Council veto
NATO Art. 5Attack on one is attack on all — collective defense
IMF conditionalityAusterity in exchange for loans — widely controversial
Tap to flip back
Soft Power vs Hard Power
Hard = force and money, Soft = attraction and persuasion, Smart = both
Joseph Nye's distinction between coercive power and attractive power
Soft power gets others to want what you want — without coercion or payment
Hard power: military force and economic coercion or incentives. Soft power (Nye): culture, values, legitimate foreign policy — others want what you want. Examples: US Hollywood and universities, BBC, Korean Wave (Hallyu). Smart power: combining both strategically. Sharp power: authoritarian information manipulation — distinct from soft power.
Hard
Coerce — military and economic carrots and sticks
Soft
Attract — culture, values, legitimacy (Joseph Nye)
Sharp
Manipulate — authoritarian information operations
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Soft Power vs Hard Power
Hard, soft, smart and sharp power?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Hard = force and money, Soft = attraction and persuasion, Smart = both
HardCoerce — military and economic carrots and sticks
SoftAttract — culture, values, legitimacy (Joseph Nye)
SharpManipulate — authoritarian information operations
Tap to flip back
🎓 Common Exam Questions