⚖️ Political Science · Elections & Voting

Election tricks that make systems click

Electoral systems, campaigns, and voter behavior — clarified.

🗳️ Elections

Memory tricks

Proven mnemonics — fast to learn, hard to forget.

🎥 How Flashcards Work
A quick walkthrough of tap-to-flip, rating, and how card colors track what you're struggling with.
← Back Next →
Elections & Voting deck1 of 16
Tap to flip
← →
How well do YOU think you know this?
Easy Medium Hard Harder
Tap to flip back
Elections & Voting deck
Easy0
Medium0
Hard0
Harder0
US Electoral College
Electoral College: 538 electors, 270 to win, winner-take-all in most states
US Electoral College
How the US president is actually elected — not by popular vote
538 total (House + Senate + 3 DC). 270 needed to win. 48 states: winner-take-all. Maine and Nebraska award by congressional district. Critics: small states and swing states over-represented.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 US Electoral College
The Electoral College — how does it work?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Electoral College: 538 electors, 270 to win, winner-take-all in most states
538 total (House + Senate + 3 DC). 270 needed to win. 48 states: winner-take-all. Maine and Nebraska award by congressional district. Critics: small states and swing states over-represented.
Tap to flip back
Duverger's Law
Duverger's Law: winner-take-all → two dominant parties
Duverger's Law
Why the US has two parties — it's structural, not accidental
In plurality (winner-take-all) elections, voters abandon third parties (wasted vote) and they collapse. Proportional representation → more parties. UK/USA = two-party; Germany/Netherlands = multi-party.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Duverger's Law
Duverger's Law?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Duverger's Law: winner-take-all → two dominant parties
In plurality (winner-take-all) elections, voters abandon third parties (wasted vote) and they collapse. Proportional representation → more parties. UK/USA = two-party; Germany/Netherlands = multi-party.
Tap to flip back
Incumbent Advantage
Incumbents win >90% of House re-election races — name recognition + resources
Incumbent Advantage
Why sitting members of Congress almost always win re-election
Name recognition, franking privilege (free mail), easier fundraising, ability to deliver constituent services, and gerrymandering all favor incumbents.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Incumbent Advantage
Incumbency advantage — how strong, and why?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Incumbents win >90% of House re-election races — name recognition + resources
Name recognition, franking privilege (free mail), easier fundraising, ability to deliver constituent services, and gerrymandering all favor incumbents.
Tap to flip back
Voter Turnout
Turnout: Education is the strongest single predictor
Voter Turnout
What drives people to vote — and what doesn't
Education level: strongest predictor. Registration requirements reduce turnout (unique to US). Competitive races increase turnout. Age: older voters turn out more. Race and income also correlate strongly.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Voter Turnout
Voter turnout — the strongest predictor?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Turnout: Education is the strongest single predictor
Education level: strongest predictor. Registration requirements reduce turnout (unique to US). Competitive races increase turnout. Age: older voters turn out more. Race and income also correlate strongly.
Tap to flip back
Gerrymandering
Gerrymandering: drawing districts to favor one party — packing and cracking
Gerrymandering
How partisan district drawing distorts electoral outcomes
Packing: concentrate opposition voters in a few districts (they win big there, wasted votes). Cracking: spread opposition voters thinly across many districts (they lose everywhere). Named after Governor Elbridge Gerry (1812).
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Gerrymandering
What is gerrymandering?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Gerrymandering: drawing districts to favor one party — packing and cracking
Packing: concentrate opposition voters in a few districts (they win big there, wasted votes). Cracking: spread opposition voters thinly across many districts (they lose everywhere). Named after Governor Elbridge Gerry (1812).
Tap to flip back
Electoral Systems
Voting systems: plurality (winner-takes-all), proportional representation, ranked-choice, mixed
Electoral Systems
Different ways of translating votes into seats — with very different outcomes
Plurality (FPTP): candidate with most votes wins — tends to produce two parties (Duverger's Law). Proportional representation: seats allocated by vote share — more parties, better minority representation. Ranked-choice voting: voters rank candidates, instant runoff eliminates last-place finisher. Mixed: combines elements (Germany).
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Electoral Systems
The main voting systems?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Voting systems: plurality (winner-takes-all), proportional representation, ranked-choice, mixed
Plurality (FPTP): candidate with most votes wins — tends to produce two parties (Duverger's Law). Proportional representation: seats allocated by vote share — more parties, better minority representation. Ranked-choice voting: voters rank candidates, instant runoff eliminates last-place finisher. Mixed: combines elements (Germany).
Tap to flip back
Campaign Finance
Campaign finance: PACs, Super PACs, dark money. Citizens United (2010): corporations = free speech.
Campaign Finance
Money in politics — the rules and the loopholes
Citizens United v FEC (2010): political spending by corporations and associations is protected free speech — cannot be limited. Super PACs: can raise and spend unlimited money but cannot coordinate with campaigns. Dark money: 501(c)(4) nonprofits spend on elections without disclosing donors. Hard money: direct contributions to candidates — limited.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Campaign Finance
Campaign finance — PACs, Super PACs, Citizens United?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Campaign finance: PACs, Super PACs, dark money. Citizens United (2010): corporations = free speech.
Citizens United v FEC (2010): political spending by corporations and associations is protected free speech — cannot be limited. Super PACs: can raise and spend unlimited money but cannot coordinate with campaigns. Dark money: 501(c)(4) nonprofits spend on elections without disclosing donors. Hard money: direct contributions to candidates — limited.
Tap to flip back
Political Socialization
Political socialization: how people acquire political beliefs — family is the strongest influence
Political Socialization
How citizens develop their political views
Primary agents: family (strongest predictor of party identification), school (civic education), peers, media, religion. Party identification: often adopts parents' party. Generational effect: political coming-of-age during significant events shapes lifetime views (Great Depression → Democrat, Reagan era → Republican). Life-cycle effects: people become more conservative with age.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Political Socialization
Political socialization — the strongest influence?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Political socialization: how people acquire political beliefs — family is the strongest influence
Primary agents: family (strongest predictor of party identification), school (civic education), peers, media, religion. Party identification: often adopts parents' party. Generational effect: political coming-of-age during significant events shapes lifetime views (Great Depression → Democrat, Reagan era → Republican). Life-cycle effects: people become more conservative with age.
Tap to flip back
Political Polarization
Partisan polarization: ideological distance between parties has increased dramatically since 1970s
Political Polarization
Why American politics has become so divided
Congressional voting records: Republicans and Democrats rarely overlap ideologically — used to overlap substantially. Causes: geographic sorting, primary elections selecting extreme candidates, media fragmentation (partisan media), negative partisanship (voting against the other party more than for your own). Consequences: gridlock, declining bipartisanship.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Political Polarization
Partisan polarization — what has happened since the 1970s?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Partisan polarization: ideological distance between parties has increased dramatically since 1970s
Congressional voting records: Republicans and Democrats rarely overlap ideologically — used to overlap substantially. Causes: geographic sorting, primary elections selecting extreme candidates, media fragmentation (partisan media), negative partisanship (voting against the other party more than for your own). Consequences: gridlock, declining bipartisanship.
Tap to flip back
Public Opinion and Polling
Public opinion polls: sampling error, question wording, response bias — not all polls are equal
Public Opinion and Polling
How polls work — and why they sometimes fail
Random sample: every person has equal chance of being selected — the only valid method. Sampling error: ±3% margin of error at 95% confidence for n=1,000. Question wording effects: small changes dramatically alter responses. Response bias: people give socially acceptable answers. Likely voter screen: likely voters differ from registered voters.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Public Opinion and Polling
Polling — what can go wrong?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Public opinion polls: sampling error, question wording, response bias — not all polls are equal
Random sample: every person has equal chance of being selected — the only valid method. Sampling error: ±3% margin of error at 95% confidence for n=1,000. Question wording effects: small changes dramatically alter responses. Response bias: people give socially acceptable answers. Likely voter screen: likely voters differ from registered voters.
Tap to flip back
Median Voter Theorem
Median voter theorem: in two-party systems, both parties converge to the political center
Median Voter Theorem
Why both parties should move toward the center — and why they often don't
Downs: rational parties maximize votes by moving toward the median voter's position. If voters distributed along a left-right spectrum, both parties converge to the middle. Why it fails: primary elections reward extreme positions, base mobilization matters more in low-turnout elections, party activists are ideologically extreme.
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Median Voter Theorem
The median voter theorem?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Median voter theorem: in two-party systems, both parties converge to the political center
Downs: rational parties maximize votes by moving toward the median voter's position. If voters distributed along a left-right spectrum, both parties converge to the middle. Why it fails: primary elections reward extreme positions, base mobilization matters more in low-turnout elections, party activists are ideologically extreme.
Tap to flip back
Electoral College
538 electors, 270 to win, winner-take-all in most states
Electoral College — how presidents are actually elected, not by popular vote
Winning the popular vote does not guarantee winning the presidency
538 total electors (435 House + 100 Senate + 3 DC via 23rd Amendment). Need 270 to win. Most states use winner-take-all. Maine and Nebraska use congressional district method. If no majority, the House chooses the president with each state delegation getting one vote. Faithless electors: SCOTUS upheld state penalties (2020).
538
435 House + 100 Senate + 3 DC (23rd Amendment)
270
Majority needed to win the presidency
Contingent
House decides if no majority — happened in 1824
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Electoral College
Electoral College numbers — and what if no one gets a majority?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
538 electors, 270 to win, winner-take-all in most states
538435 House + 100 Senate + 3 DC (23rd Amendment)
270Majority needed to win the presidency
ContingentHouse decides if no majority — happened in 1824
Tap to flip back
Voting Rights Amendments
15-19-24-26 — Race, Sex, Poll tax, Age 18
Four constitutional amendments that expanded the right to vote
Voting rights expanded through amendments over 100 years — each required political struggle
15th (1870): cannot deny vote based on race — but poll taxes and literacy tests circumvented it for decades. 19th (1920): women's suffrage after decades of activism. 24th (1964): abolished poll taxes in federal elections. 26th (1971): voting age to 18 — "old enough to fight, old enough to vote." Voting Rights Act (1965): banned discriminatory practices.
15th (1870)
Race — undermined by Jim Crow until Voting Rights Act 1965
19th (1920)
Sex — women suffrage after 72 years of activism
24th (1964)
Poll taxes used to disenfranchise poor Black voters
26th (1971)
Age 18 — Vietnam War era, drafted but could not vote
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Voting Rights Amendments
The voting rights amendments — 15th, 19th, 24th, 26th?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
15-19-24-26 — Race, Sex, Poll tax, Age 18
15th (1870)Race — undermined by Jim Crow until Voting Rights Act 1965
19th (1920)Sex — women suffrage after 72 years of activism
24th (1964)Poll taxes used to disenfranchise poor Black voters
26th (1971)Age 18 — Vietnam War era, drafted but could not vote
Tap to flip back
Campaign Finance
Citizens United = money is speech, corporations can spend unlimited
Citizens United v. FEC (2010) — corporations have First Amendment rights
Citizens United allowed unlimited independent political spending by corporations and unions
Citizens United: corporations and unions can spend unlimited on independent expenditures — led to Super PACs. Hard money: direct donations to candidates — capped by FEC. Super PACs: raise and spend unlimited but cannot coordinate directly with campaigns. Dark money: 501(c)(4) nonprofits spend politically without disclosing donors.
Hard money
To candidate — capped by FEC rules
Super PAC
Independent spending — unlimited, no direct coordination
Dark money
501(c)(4)s spend politically without donor disclosure
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Campaign Finance
Citizens United — and campaign finance terms?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
Citizens United = money is speech, corporations can spend unlimited
Hard moneyTo candidate — capped by FEC rules
Super PACIndependent spending — unlimited, no direct coordination
Dark money501(c)(4)s spend politically without donor disclosure
Tap to flip back
Gerrymandering
PACK and CRACK — concentrate or dilute the opposition
Two gerrymandering strategies for drawing favorable district boundaries
Gerrymandering manipulates who wins elections before any votes are cast
Packing: concentrate opponents into as few districts as possible — they win big but waste votes. Cracking: spread opponents thin across many districts — they lose narrowly everywhere. Racial gerrymandering: unconstitutional if race is predominant factor (Shaw v. Reno). Partisan gerrymandering: federal courts cannot police it (Rucho v. Common Cause, 2019).
Pack
Cram opponents into one district — wins big, wastes votes
Crack
Spread opponents thin — lose everywhere by small margins
Racial
Unconstitutional if race is the predominant factor
🎥 Watch Instead
▶
Video coming soon
This lesson's animated video hasn't been made yet — check back soon.
Flashcard
🃏 Gerrymandering
Packing vs cracking?
Tap to flip
🃏 Answer
PACK and CRACK — concentrate or dilute the opposition
PackCram opponents into one district — wins big, wastes votes
CrackSpread opponents thin — lose everywhere by small margins
RacialUnconstitutional if race is the predominant factor
Tap to flip back
🎓 Common Exam Questions